I'm glad to see that the XO-1.75 is doing so well. I'm a bit skeptical about the XO-1 though.Did it have a jffs2 or a ubi image? Boot time depends to a big extend to read/decompression speeds so this may be important.It also depends on services initiated. Looked like that for the longest time the XO-1 was trying to connect unsuccessfully. XO-1.xx may very well be twice as fast as the XO-1 but not on boot time. XO-1 does 1 to 1.5 minutes depending on the image. http://www.flickr.com/photos/35623379@N07/5767549684/in/photostream --- On Thu, 1/19/12, Lionel Laské <[email protected]> wrote:
From: Lionel Laské <[email protected]> Subject: [support-gang] XO Boot time battle To: [email protected], [email protected] Date: Thursday, January 19, 2012, 3:00 AM Hi all, Tuesday, at the monthly OLPC France meeting we made a comparison of the boot time from XO 1.75, XO 1.5 and XO 1.0.Have a look of the result on the video here: http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xnt5rw_xo-boot-battle_tech Best regards from France. Lionel. -----Inline Attachment Follows----- _______________________________________________ support-gang mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/support-gang
_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
