On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Peter Robinson <[email protected]> wrote:
> I don't disagree but ultimately if there's not appropriate bug reports > with all the information needed we can't fix the problems. So > ultimately I appreciate his bug reports but with a non standard > configuration we need detailed reports to have that information be > useful for those people that actually have to deal with the > information and fix the problem. Peter, You make a fair point, but with 189 tickets filed in the OLPC Trac, I'm not sure one can say Mikus hasn't taken the time to provide feedback in standard configuration. My main point is that these snap reports to the list (immediately after release) usually come in before I can even complete the download and I personally find them very useful. There have been occasions where the reports prompted me to jump right in and update and others where I made a decision to wait for a subsequent dev-build based on what I was interested in testing. I've always been interested in Mikus' unusual SD card config as it allows him to locally host and conduct tests on some many activities in rapid succession. it is not necessarily important from a deployment's point of view, but it is of great interest to prolific activity testers like Mikus, and we could certainly use more of those. cjl _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
