So, the 3.3.4 headers are fine for the 3.0.19 kernel? Thx again --- On Mon, 5/7/12, Peter Robinson <[email protected]> wrote:
> From: Peter Robinson <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: F17-ARM devel tools > To: "Martin Langhoff" <[email protected]> > Cc: "Yioryos Asprobounitis" <[email protected]>, "OLPC Devel" > <[email protected]> > Date: Monday, May 7, 2012, 2:12 PM > On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 4:26 PM, > Martin Langhoff > <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Yioryos Asprobounitis > > <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> groupinstall'ed "Development Tools" on 21009o2 and > noticed 2 things. > >> Kernel-devel is 3.0.19_xo... but kernel-headers is > 3.3.4-3.f17. > >> gcc-4.7.0-4 is an unsigned rpm. > >> Are these expected and OK to go on? > > > > Yeah, I think all ARM rpms are expected to be unsigned. > The builders > > are not "official" yet. > > They are signed generally although I think the signing is a > bit behind > so there's likely some that aren't signed. It should catch > up in the > next day or so now that things are settling down for the > mainline F-17 > release. It's not the fastest of processes and it's one > of the few > bits of releases that is a manual process as it requires > someone to > enter the key for the signing. > > Peter > _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
