On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 8:02 PM, Daniel Narvaez <dwnarv...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > things are looking good so far, we already have all the models booting into > sugar 0.101 with wif apparentlyi working. I would like to take a step back > and understand a bit better where we want to go with this. Some random > thoughts and questions. > > * To really understand how much work is left I think we need some good > testing, especially on the hardware related bits. I expect there will be > lots of small things to fix, but it would be good to understand as early as > possible if there are roadblocks. I'm a bad tester and I've never used the > XO much, so I'm often not sure what is a regression and what is not... thus > helping with this would be particularly appreciated. > * Which deployments are planning to ship 0.102 soon and hence are interested > in this work? I know of AU. Maybe Uruguay? > * Do we need to support all the XO models? > * Should we contribute the olpc-os-builder changes back to OLPC or fork it? > I don't know if OLPC will do any active development on the linux side of > things, if not maybe better to turn this into a sugarlabs thing. > * Are interested deployments using olpc-update? If I'm not mistake AU is > not. > * Do we care about maintaining the GNOME "dual boot"? I'm afraid we do, but > I want to make sure. > * As I mentioned in some other thread I'm interested in setting up automated > builds from sugar master. I have some vague plan of what it would look like > and wrote bits of it. The basic idea is that you would push changes to > github and get images automatically built. I think this is good for upstream > testing but the same infrastructure could be used by deployments. Are people > interested in using this?
Why is all this work being put into Fedora 20? The maintenance window is limited and as of the next release they won't even support non-KMS drivers by default. Wouldn't make sense to look into a distribution that provides and LTS release? Resources already seem to be limited so having to chase after Fedora every 6 months to a year seems like a waste of resources. The GTK3 and GNOME teams obviously have their eyes on a different class of hardware than what is being used by deployments. -Jon _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
