On 13 May 2014 00:43, Paul Fox <p...@laptop.org> wrote: > daniel wrote: > > * Should we contribute the olpc-os-builder changes back to OLPC or fork > it? > > > I don't know if OLPC will do any active development on the linux side > of > > > things, if not maybe better to turn this into a sugarlabs thing. > ... > > Yes. I don't really have a strong feeling one way or another. I can send > > patches for the generic parts if they are wanted. > > > > I think we also need a place where to put reference configurations. I > > initially had put them in olpc-os-builder, numbered as 14.0.0 but that > > feels wrong... since no official olpc releases are planned. I suppose I > > could edit the examples/f18-[model].ini ones instead, but I would need > > access to whatever repository we use to change those without needing > review > > every time. > > in my opinion, the value of not forking would outweigh the risk of > giving commit privs to someone from (gasp!) sugarlabs. ;-) (that really > is just an opinion, of course. it's not my call.) >
I don't know... we are kind of dangerous people :P > it also seems like this problem could be well solved with branches and > tags. i haven't looked at the o-o-b tree, but i assume the current > 13.2.0 point could be frozen (branch or tag) and other work could > continue, and eventually branched or tagged itself. > Yeah, I made my changes on a branch already (v8.0).
_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
