On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 10:42:35PM -0400, Adam Holt wrote: > On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 10:36 PM, James Cameron <qu...@laptop.org> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 09:30:30PM -0500, Jerry Vonau wrote: > > On March 16, 2015 at 9:23 PM James Cameron <qu...@laptop.org> wrote: > > > > > > There's no need to go as far as configuring as an access point when > > > ad-hoc networking will work, with suitable configuration of the other > > > laptops connecting to it. > > > > Has sugar addressed http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/3708? > > Why would you use Sugar? > > We'd love to keep some/any version of Sugar on the XO if possible, > even if just so the librarian can putter.
Okay, then #3708 certainly needs fixing, or hacking around. > Important: how compatible is the XO's Ad-Hoc networking with generic Android > tablets/phones and generic/vintage cheap laptops already out there in the > world? About this much: [ ] If the other units are specified for IEEE 802.11g then they should support ad-hoc interoperability with any XO laptop, at a radio protocol level. > Any other low-to-medium complexity protocols we should be > considering, for XO-1.5 and higher especially, that might plausibly > sail with a few weeks of hacking? (that is if a genuine WiFi > hotspot brings more compatibility) DHCP. Fairly complex. > Anyway: scalability's not a requirement (in this case!) as such > community libraries are tiny, having a couple WiFi devices attached > generally, rarely more. Great! -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel