On 2/20/2011 6:08 PM, Cristian Paul Peñaranda Rojas wrote:
Not that i'm aware of, you help will be really apreciated. Btw, i'm curios why you need llvm?
Well we don't need LLVM but we are going to add some (high level) instructions to the mico32 instruction set and we'll want to add support for the instructions in higher level languages. We could just add support to GCC but LLVM seems a better long term solution and we're gambling that we'll get more funding :-). We also have some familiarity with LLVM internals but not GCC internals.
From what we've read the GCC port is not great and still needs some work - not that our port will be any better but I think it will be easier to find and fix bugs in LLVM than GCC.
JP _______________________________________________ http://lists.milkymist.org/listinfo.cgi/devel-milkymist.org IRC: #milkymist@Freenode Twitter: www.twitter.com/milkymistvj Ideas? http://milkymist.uservoice.com
