openframeworks looks way more interesting than processing... I think a great idea to bill MM1 as a standaline box to run compiled interactive multimedia...
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Barry Threw <[email protected]> wrote: > The major point is just leveraging a toolkit that people already use for > live graphics. OpenFrameworks is another option and doesn't require Java, if > a method is available to have it interoperate with the Milkymist. > > bt > > On 2/25/11 4:50 PM, Sebastien Bourdeauducq wrote: >> >> On Fri, 2011-02-25 at 16:36 -0800, Jon Phillips wrote: >>> >>> The main reason is that loads of people are using processing for live >>> and interactive installations, but there is no embedded solution that >>> can just boot directly into a running processing script. This would be >>> killer for live installation and having live displays etc. Soooooooo >>> many ppl are using this... >> >> Can't they use something else? The Java, hm, sorry, Processing syntax is >> very close to C, which is a lot less trouble and runs faster. It worked >> for Arduino... just copy the GUI/design maybe. >> >> > > -- Jon Phillips http://fabricatorz.com/ chat/skype: kidproto | irc: rejon +1.415.830.3884 (global) | +1-510-499-0894 (sf) _______________________________________________ http://lists.milkymist.org/listinfo.cgi/devel-milkymist.org IRC: #milkymist@Freenode Twitter: www.twitter.com/milkymistvj Ideas? http://milkymist.uservoice.com
