Cristian Paul Pe?aranda Rojas wrote:
> You already suguest the U shaped connector, in some way this could solve
> the right fit problem, of course you still need use always same U shaped
> board
You could still:
- reverse the board by 180 degrees (if the two connectors are the
same size and if they are parallel),
- shift the board along the long axis of the connector, e.g.,
instead if connecting
(o) (o) (o) . . . (o) (o)
(o) (o) (o) . . . (o) (o)
you'd connect
( ) (o) (o) . . . (o) (o) o
( ) (o) (o) . . . (o) (o) o
or
o (o) (o) (o) . . . (o) ( )
o (o) (o) (o) . . . (o) ( )
- shift the board along the short axis of the connector, e.g.,
( ) ( ) ( ) . . .
(o) (o) (o) . . .
o o o
- use an improvised header that uses only a subset of the contacts
available, much like I did with ledm:
http://downloads.qi-hardware.com/people/werner/m1/leds/ledm-back.jpg
So there's still quite a bit of potential for trouble :)
- Werner
_______________________________________________
http://lists.milkymist.org/listinfo.cgi/devel-milkymist.org
IRC: #milkymist@Freenode
