Adam Wang wrote:
> See Q3 with D1 in circuit:
> http://downloads.qi-hardware.com/people/adam/m1/tmp/m1r4/Misc_led_20120202.pdf

Looks good, except that R229 works against the pull-up in the
FPGA, which probably works but looks a bit ugly. How about
making R229 a pull-up, too ?

By the way, PWM for D41/D42 is only an idea in case we need to
dim the LEDs. If we don't need that, they could just be always
on or off, like in M1rc3.

> 1). R41 = 120 Ohm

That would be very bright :-)

>   D1 is fully ON, If = Ids = 9.67mA when I simulated LED_PWR net(i.e. gate
> pin of Q3) to connect 3.3V net [ simulated a pullup ]

How did you simulate ? Qucs ?

> 2). R41 = 560 Ohm
>   D1 ON, If = Ids = 2.446mA, 3.3V on gate pin [ a pullup ]

Looks good. ~2.5 mA is also what I got in my measurements with
LTST-C190KRKT.

>   D1 OFF, 0 uA [ a pulldown ]

Well, technically it would be a "strong drive".

> 3). PWM test, don't know how to test it since my current weakness on f/w.

You would have to write a bit of Verilog :-) It would be easy
(much simpler than the LED matrix controller), but as I said,
we may not even need this.

> 4). off-ledm, R42 drew with a 560 Ohm.

Good.

> dark -->  no power/disabl , do you know which current pulled out fpga pin

Nominally zero ? Not sure if I understood the question.

> so I think that I need to detemine R41 value from your current flow of
> LTST-C190KRK (off-ledm circuit example from circuit R42 you there), then I
> fine trun same current with resistance (my site here) to get an expected
> brightness.
> How do you think?

Yes, sounds good. I just saw that I have a few APT1608SURCK. That's
the same junction as in the diode we want to M1r4. Maybe I'll give
it a try ...

> for off-ledm, [...]

Hmm, easy to misread as "off-LED", which would be confusing :)

> [...] two leds D1 [DC-in] and D2 [Booted], according chat in irc, I
> drew them for:
> a). on-ledm, R200 ~ R203 marks as 270 Ohm
> b). off-ledm, R41, TBD
> c). off-ledm, R42, 560 Ohm

If Q3.Rds(on) << R41, then R41 should be equal to R42. And, given
the date we have so far, both should be around 560 Ohm. I.e., you
can change "TBD" to "560 Ohm" :)

- Werner
_______________________________________________
http://lists.milkymist.org/listinfo.cgi/devel-milkymist.org
IRC: #milkymist@Freenode

Reply via email to