>
> Looks good, except that R229 works against the pull-up in the
> FPGA, which probably works but looks a bit ugly. How about
> making R229 a pull-up, too ?
>
>
yuh, after chatting in irc, I'll change R229 to be as an pull-up, tks.


> >   D1 is fully ON, If = Ids = 9.67mA when I simulated LED_PWR net(i.e.
> gate
> > pin of Q3) to connect 3.3V net [ simulated a pullup ]
>
> How did you simulate ? Qucs ?
>

Through my fingers and held extendable wire from gate pin of Q3 to touch
3.3V and GND. ;-)


> > dark -->  no power/disabl , do you know which current pulled out fpga pin
>
> Nominally zero ? Not sure if I understood the question.
>
>
No need this now. ;-)


> > so I think that I need to detemine R41 value from your current flow of
> > LTST-C190KRK (off-ledm circuit example from circuit R42 you there), then
> I
> > fine trun same current with resistance (my site here) to get an expected
> > brightness.
> > How do you think?
>
> Yes, sounds good. I just saw that I have a few APT1608SURCK. That's
> the same junction as in the diode we want to M1r4. Maybe I'll give
> it a try ...
>

good, later let me know. :)


>
> If Q3.Rds(on) << R41, then R41 should be equal to R42. And, given
> the date we have so far, both should be around 560 Ohm. I.e., you
> can change "TBD" to "560 Ohm" :)
>

Q3.Rds(on) = 5 Ohm  << R41, okay, let it be also 560 Ohm, tks.

- adam
_______________________________________________
http://lists.milkymist.org/listinfo.cgi/devel-milkymist.org
IRC: #milkymist@Freenode

Reply via email to