I agree too !! But also also the work from JP Bonn is great, as an _alternative_ for those looking another compiler to learn and get fun (may be also creating its own closed source optimizations later, wasn't this llvm's purpose too?)
I don't see llvm is going to take place in rtems/linux anytime soon, and i guess linux is very happy with gcc extensions etc.(correct me linux devs?) Of course one thing will be messy is having some compiler there and other here, so we'll need now two toolchains to cross compile future milkymist releases??, at least that messy and confusing for my point of view. I go for GCC, is upstream, may be not very loving port but works for us now :-). > For my part, I share David's sentiment that we need a great GCC > compiler, but I also understand Sebastien who is frustrated about > inefficiencies of getting that toolchain up... _______________________________________________ http://lists.milkymist.org/listinfo.cgi/devel-milkymist.org IRC: #milkymist@Freenode
