So, is this (one-way communications, e.g., repeated Bcasts) pathological and not worth worrying about. Or, are other solutions worth considering? E.g., I'd like to have a sending process run mca_btl_sm_component_progress occasionally, even if it is successfully completing its sends.
I have a fix for ticket 1944 working, but the broader problem is
unpleasant. E.g., let's say we have zillions of uncountered Bcasts or
something. Say, the root is repeatedly emitting sends, but never
polling its in-coming FIFO. Return fragments will be accumulating, the
FIFO will be congested, pending-send queues on peer processes will be
growing, etc. The code now handles this (by growing the pending-send
queues and eventually draining them, pre-1.3.2 we would also have
handled this by growing the FIFO and using up the shared memory), but
the whole thing is disturbing. E.g., queues might drain only when the
root reaches MPI_Finalize. (Okay, unclear to me what sort of real
application would have communications only from one process going out.)
- [OMPI devel] sm BTL flow management Eugene Loh
- Re: [OMPI devel] sm BTL flow management Ralph Castain
- Re: [OMPI devel] sm BTL flow management Bryan Lally
- Re: [OMPI devel] sm BTL flow management Eugene Loh
- Re: [OMPI devel] sm BTL flow management Ralph Castain
- Re: [OMPI devel] sm BTL flow manage... Eugene Loh
- Re: [OMPI devel] sm BTL flow ma... Jeff Squyres
- Re: [OMPI devel] sm BTL flow management Eugene Loh
- Re: [OMPI devel] sm BTL flow manage... Brian W. Barrett
- Re: [OMPI devel] sm BTL flow management Brian W. Barrett
- Re: [OMPI devel] sm BTL flow manage... Paul H. Hargrove