Totally insane ... but I was not talking about your rationale. ^^
How did we ended up with the following situation:
-libmca_common_sm_so_version=1:0:0
-libmca_common_mx_so_version=0:0:0
+libmca_common_sm_so_version=2:0:0
+libmca_common_mx_so_version=1:0:0
Where the same type of component (common sm and mx here) have different version
numbers?
Thanks,
george.
On Jun 5, 2010, at 06:08 , Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
>
> * Jeff Squyres wrote on Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 09:34:16PM CEST:
>> SHORT VERSION: We broke ABI from the 1.4 series to the v1.5 series. I
>> propose changing all the libtool .so version numbers as shown below to
>> enforce that break. Can someone sanity check this?
>
> Looks sane to me, with the details you have given.
>
> Cheers,
> Ralf
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> de...@open-mpi.org
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
