On Jun 7, 2010, at 10:29 PM, George Bosilca wrote: > How did we ended up with the following situation: > > -libmca_common_sm_so_version=1:0:0 > -libmca_common_mx_so_version=0:0:0 > +libmca_common_sm_so_version=2:0:0 > +libmca_common_mx_so_version=1:0:0 > > Where the same type of component (common sm and mx here) have different > version numbers?
I forget the exact issue -- at some point during the 1.3/1.4 series, we made changes to libcommon_sm.so. IIRC, the interfaces entirely changed. Hence, the first number went to 1. Similar changes did not happen to libcommon_mx.so, so it stayed 0:0:0. -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
