Rolf, I updated my bitbucket base on your and George's comments. Let me know if 
you find any more problems.

-Nathan

On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 10:18:20AM -0700, Rolf vandeVaart wrote:
> Hi Nathan:
> I downloaded and tried it out.  There were a few issues that I had to work 
> through, but finally got things working.
> Can you apply this patch to your changes prior to checking things in?
> 
> I also would suggest configuring with --enable-picky as there are something 
> like 10 warnings generated due to your changes.  And check for tabs.
> 
> Otherwise, I think it is good.
> 
> Rolf
> 
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: devel-boun...@open-mpi.org [mailto:devel-boun...@open-mpi.org]
> >On Behalf Of George Bosilca
> >Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2012 12:49 PM
> >To: Open MPI Developers
> >Subject: Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: hide btl segment keys within btl
> >
> >Looks good to me. I would add some checks regarding the number and size of
> >the segments and the allocated space (MCA_BTL_SEG_MAX_SIZE) to make
> >sure we never hit the corner case where there are too many segments
> >compared with the available space. And add a huge comment in the btl.h
> >about the fact that mca_btl_base_segment_t should be used with extreme
> >care.
> >
> >  george.
> >
> >On Jun 14, 2012, at 18:42 , Jeff Squyres wrote:
> >
> >> This sounds like a good thing to me.  +1
> >>
> >> On Jun 13, 2012, at 12:58 PM, Nathan Hjelm wrote:
> >>
> >>> What: hide btl segment keys from PML/OSC code.
> >>>
> >>> Why: As it stands new BTLs with larger segment keys (smcuda for example)
> >require changes in both OSC/rdma as well as the PMLs. This RFC makes will
> >make changes in segment keys transparent to all btl users.
> >>>
> >>> When: The changes are very straight-forward so I am setting the timeout
> >for this to June 22, 2012
> >>>
> >>> Where: See the attached patch or check out the bitbucket
> >http://bitbucket.org/hjelmn/ompi-btl-interface-update
> >>>
> >>> All the relevant PMLs/BTLs + OSC/rdma have been updated with the
> >exception of btl/wv. I have also tested the following components:
> >>> - ob1
> >>> - csum
> >>> - bfo
> >>> - ugni (now works with MPI one-sides)
> >>> - sm
> >>> - vader
> >>> - openib (in progress)
> >>>
> >>> Brian and Rolf, please take a look at your components and let me know if I
> >screwed anything up.
> >>>
> >>> -Nathan Hjelm
> >>> HPC-3, LANL
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> devel mailing list
> >>> de...@open-mpi.org
> >>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Jeff Squyres
> >> jsquy...@cisco.com
> >> For corporate legal information go to:
> >http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> devel mailing list
> >> de...@open-mpi.org
> >> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >devel mailing list
> >de...@open-mpi.org
> >http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may 
> contain
> confidential information.  Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or 
> distribution
> is prohibited.  If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the 
> sender by
> reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------


> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> de...@open-mpi.org
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel

Reply via email to