On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 07:16:00AM -0700, Ralph Castain wrote: > Yeah, even if someone volunteered to do the conversion work, we wouldn't get > agreement on making such a change. Some of us hate git (myself included), > some feel similarly about mercurial, etc. > > Unfortunately, we've seen enough pain from git+svn to definitely not want to > go that route.
Personally I have had no problems with git svn. In fact every commit I have made in the last 6 months has been with git svn dcommit. Any issues have been user error as I have to push/pull from my cluser tree (which gets out of sync a lot-- can't update it easily from off-site). -Nathan
