We keep having this discussion, and every time the answer is "no - stick with 
what we currently do". Can we please stop having it over and over again?

Until someone can point out a problem that (a) needs solving and (b) can only 
be solved by making a huge change to a DVCS, there is no reason to keep going 
over this ground.


On Aug 20, 2012, at 8:16 AM, Jeff Squyres <jsquy...@cisco.com> wrote:

> On Aug 20, 2012, at 11:10 AM, Nathan Hjelm wrote:
> 
>>> Unfortunately, we've seen enough pain from git+svn to definitely not want 
>>> to go that route.
>> 
>> Personally I have had no problems with git svn. In fact every commit I have 
>> made in the last 6 months has been with git svn dcommit. Any issues have 
>> been user error as I have to push/pull from my cluser tree (which gets out 
>> of sync a lot-- can't update it easily from off-site).
> 
> Keep in mind that that is not what Mike is proposing.  :-)
> 
> github has some cleverness that allows both svn and git clients to the same 
> repository.
> 
> That being said, I think that this is a pretty large discussion:
> 
> - do we want to move to a DVCS?
>  - if so, which one: hg or git?
> 
> - if we move, will IU host it, or will we use Bitbucket / github?
> 
> - what do we do about a bug tracker?
>  - continue to use Trac?
>  - use the bug tracker on Bitbucket / github?
>  - ...?
> 
> - who will do all the migration work?
>  - official source code migration
>  - existing open ticket migration
>  - user migration
>  - ...probably some other things I'm not thinking of
> 
> - who will develop the "best practices" guidelines for use of a DVCS?  
> Examples:
>  - is rebasing before committing encouraged/required/discouraged/...etc.
>  - how do we do version release branches -- different repos, or branches 
> within a repo, or ...?
>  - ...etc.
> 
> -- 
> Jeff Squyres
> jsquy...@cisco.com
> For corporate legal information go to: 
> http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> de...@open-mpi.org
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel


Reply via email to