On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Dmitri Gribenko <griboz...@gmail.com>wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 9:11 PM, Paul Hargrove <phhargr...@lbl.gov> wrote: > > Ralph, > > > > I work at a National Lab, and like many of my peers I develop/prototype > > codes on my desktop and/or laptop. So, I think the default behavior of > > mpicc on a Clang-based Mac is entirely relevant. > > > > FWIW: > > I agree w/ Jeff that these datatype checking warnings "feel" like a > > candidate for "-Wall" (or "-Wextra"), rather than enabled by default. > > Hi Paul, > > Is there any particular case you are concerned about? > > Dmitri > > Dmitri, No, I don't have specific usage cases that concern me. As I said a minute or two ago in a reply to Ralph, my concern is that the Sandia codes provide an "existence proof" that "really smart people" can write questionable code at times. So, I fear that a larger-than-expected fraction of real codes would generate warnings. -Paul -- Paul H. Hargrove phhargr...@lbl.gov Future Technologies Group Computer and Data Sciences Department Tel: +1-510-495-2352 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Fax: +1-510-486-6900
