On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 6:51 PM, Jeff Squyres <jsquy...@cisco.com> wrote:
> On Nov 19, 2012, at 11:47 AM, Dmitri Gribenko wrote:
>
>>> 3. the warnings are disabled for buffer types of (char*) or (void*)
>>
>> I think that disabling warnings for char* might make sense.  But
>> during the LLVM developer meeting I talked with Hal Finkel (MPICH2
>> developer) about this.  These annotations are already integrated into
>> MPICH2.  Hal said that he found real bugs with these warnings
>> involving char* buffers.
>>
>> Is it really not an option for the codebase in question to build with
>> -D... or -Wno-...?
>
>
> It is pedantic, but I can still side with: it's valid MPI (and those who do 
> it usually do it for a reason), so we shouldn't warn about it.
>
> How about a phased implementation:
>
> 3a. Have an option to *also* warn about (char*) mismatches?
> 3b. Over time (perhaps in coordination with MPICH?), and polling once this 
> initial implementation has been out in the world for a while: if user want, 
> we can change the default to warn about (char*) mismatches by default

We can move warnings for char* to a separate warning group,
-Wtype-safety-char-ptr and make it off by default.

Dmitri

-- 
main(i,j){for(i=2;;i++){for(j=2;j<i;j++){if(!(i%j)){j=0;break;}}if
(j){printf("%d\n",i);}}} /*Dmitri Gribenko <griboz...@gmail.com>*/

Reply via email to