Just an FYI: on the Mac ML, I see this:

   Searching for m4
     Found m4 version 4; checking version...
       Found version component 4 -- need 1

$ m4 --version
m4 (GNU M4) 1.4.16

Looks like the parser isn't quite picking it up correctly, but it is releasing 
it because it thinks the 4 is above the required 1


On Nov 15, 2012, at 8:42 AM, "Hjelm, Nathan T" <hje...@lanl.gov> wrote:

> Committed as r27615. Let me know if there are any more issues.
> 
> -Nathan
> 
> ________________________________________
> From: devel-boun...@open-mpi.org [devel-boun...@open-mpi.org] on behalf of 
> Ralph Castain [r...@open-mpi.org]
> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 8:53 AM
> To: Open MPI Developers
> Subject: Re: [OMPI devel] [OMPI svn] svn:open-mpi r27601 - trunk
> 
> Looks fine to me. I would only add one further refinement - I think we should 
> check m4, but add a check in autogen.pl so that if we get nothing useful back 
> from -v (or whatever), then output a warning that we couldn't validate the 
> version and assume it is okay.
> 
> I believe the tool will return a non-zero status if the option isn't 
> supported, so we should be able to do this - yes?
> 
> 
> On Nov 15, 2012, at 7:48 AM, "Hjelm, Nathan T" <hje...@lanl.gov> wrote:
> 
>> Since the version of m4 that comes with Solaris likely works with all our 
>> .m4 files and there is no way to check the version (no --version, -v, -V, or 
>> anything from what I can tell) I guess we have no choice but to not check 
>> the m4 version.
>> 
>> flex on the other hand we can check. How about this for the new regex (for 
>> reference the old one is $version =~ m/\s([\d\w\.]+)$/m; -- matching a 
>> version at the end of the line):
>> 
>> $version =~ m/\s([\d\.]+\w?)/m;
>> 
>> It works with Apple's flex and still works with glibtoolize, autoconf, and 
>> automake.
>> 
>>  Searching for autoconf
>>    Found autoconf version 2.69; checking version...
>>      Found version component 2 -- need 2
>>      Found version component 69 -- need 65
>>    ==> ACCEPTED
>>  Searching for libtoolize
>> libtoolize not found
>>  Searching for glibtoolize
>>    Found glibtoolize version 2.4.2; checking version...
>>      Found version component 2 -- need 2
>>      Found version component 4 -- need 2
>>    ==> ACCEPTED
>>  Searching for automake
>>    Found automake version 1.12.2; checking version...
>>      Found version component 1 -- need 1
>>      Found version component 12 -- need 11
>>    ==> ACCEPTED
>>  Searching for flex
>>    Found flex version 2.5.35; checking version...
>>      Found version component 2 -- need 2
>>      Found version component 5 -- need 5
>>      Found version component 35 -- need 35
>>    ==> ACCEPTED
>>  Searching for m4
>>    Found m4 version 1.4.6; checking version...
>>      Found version component 1 -- need 1
>>      Found version component 4 -- need 4
>>      Found version component 6 -- need 16
>>    ==> Too low!  Skipping this version
>>  Searching for gm4
>>    Found gm4 version 1.4.16; checking version...
>>      Found version component 1 -- need 1
>>      Found version component 4 -- need 4
>>      Found version component 16 -- need 16
>>    ==> ACCEPTED
>> 
>> 
>> -Nathan
>> 
>> ________________________________________
>> From: devel-boun...@open-mpi.org [devel-boun...@open-mpi.org] on behalf of 
>> Paul Hargrove [phhargr...@lbl.gov]
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 7:37 PM
>> To: Larry Baker
>> Cc: Open MPI Developers
>> Subject: Re: [OMPI devel] [OMPI svn] svn:open-mpi r27601 - trunk
>> 
>> Larry,
>> 
>> I just wanted to speak up quickly to be sure nobody used your example to 
>> "fix" the Mac OS problem and thereby break Solaris instead.  No personal 
>> attack/affront was intended.
>> 
>> -Paulhttps://mymail.lanl.gov/owa/?ae=PreFormAction&t=IPM.Note&a=ReplyAll&id=RgAAAAD3GfjXt9HDTI902%2b63W1IcBwCuRfL1X%2babT5m7NFXoIdcVAAAAxVZxAACuRfL1X%2babT5m7NFXoIdcVAAAa4RQFAAAJ#
>> 
>> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Larry Baker 
>> <ba...@usgs.gov<mailto:ba...@usgs.gov>> wrote:
>> Paul,
>> 
>> 1) I wasn't trying to solve the --version issue, only the parsing of the 
>> response.
>> 2) I assumed from the initial e-mail that the broken parser was in a Perl 
>> script.  I'm not a Perl person, so I wrote the example regular expression 
>> parser in sed.
>> 
>> These commands were done on my Mac OS X 10.6 system.  I have no idea where 
>> the apps came from.  I know the sed, at least, does not recognize regular 
>> expressions documented for GNU sed (such as \< \> for begin/end word).  
>> Maybe it is a BSD sed?
>> 
>> I was just trying to illustrate how to fix the broken parsing of Ralph's 
>> "flex --version".  Assuming the RE parser I wrote is satisfactory, it would 
>> have to be adapted to fit in the framework, i.e., it has to be portable.
>> 
>> Larry Baker
>> US Geological Survey
>> 650-329-5608<tel:650-329-5608>
>> ba...@usgs.gov<mailto:ba...@usgs.gov>
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 14 Nov 2012, at 5:41 PM, Paul Hargrove wrote:
>> 
>> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 6:26 PM, Larry Baker 
>> <ba...@usgs.gov<mailto:ba...@usgs.gov>> wrote:
>> m4 --version | sed -n -E -e 
>> '1s/^.*[^A-Za-z0-9_-]?([0-9]+[.][0-9]+[.][0-9]+)[^A-Za-z0-9_-]?.*$/\1/p'
>> 
>> 
>> There are STILL problems with this approach as it is TWICE specific to GNU 
>> software:
>> 
>> 1) M4 on OpenBSD (maybe others) doesn't support a "--version" flag:
>> $ m4 --version | sed -n -E -e 
>> '1s/^.*[^A-Za-z0-9_-]?([0-9]+[.][0-9]+[.][0-9]+)[^A-Za-z0-9_-]?.*$/\1/p'
>> m4: unknown option -- -
>> usage: m4 [-gPs] [-Dname[=value]] [-d flags] [-I dirname] [-o filename]
>>       [-t macro] [-Uname] [file ...]
>> 
>> 2) sed on Solaris (maybe others) doesn't support a "-E" flag:
>> $ m4 --version | sed -n -E -e 
>> '1s/^.*[^A-Za-z0-9_-]?([0-9]+[.][0-9]+[.][0-9]+)[^A-Za-z0-9_-]?.*$/\1/p'
>> /bin/sed: illegal option -- E
>> 
>> -Paul
>> 
>> --
>> Paul H. Hargrove                          
>> phhargr...@lbl.gov<mailto:phhargr...@lbl.gov>
>> Future Technologies Group
>> Computer and Data Sciences Department     Tel: 
>> +1-510-495-2352<tel:%2B1-510-495-2352>
>> Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory     Fax: 
>> +1-510-486-6900<tel:%2B1-510-486-6900>
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> devel mailing list
>> de...@open-mpi.org<mailto:de...@open-mpi.org>
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Paul H. Hargrove                          
>> phhargr...@lbl.gov<mailto:phhargr...@lbl.gov>
>> Future Technologies Group
>> Computer and Data Sciences Department     Tel: +1-510-495-2352
>> Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory     Fax: +1-510-486-6900
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> devel mailing list
>> de...@open-mpi.org
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> de...@open-mpi.org
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
> 
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> de...@open-mpi.org
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel


Reply via email to