Let's bump it to Thurs - I trust what you say, but haven't had a chance to 
glance at the changes. Likewise, it would be nice to let Jeff return from 
vacation and look at it too.


On Apr 5, 2013, at 12:11 PM, Nathan Hjelm <hje...@lanl.gov> wrote:

> Yeah, I figured since the changes are self contained (doesn't tough many 
> outside pieces except info support and mpi.h.in) it would be ok to do a short 
> timeout. If not I can bump it to Thursday April 11.
> 
> -Nathan
> 
> On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 12:02:22PM -0700, Ralph Castain wrote:
>> Ummmm....did you really mean a timeout of Mon?? Could you delay that a bit 
>> so we can actually have time to look at it?
>> 
>> 
>> On Apr 5, 2013, at 11:56 AM, Nathan Hjelm <hje...@lanl.gov> wrote:
>> 
>>> Also, please look at the thread level support. We had some discussion at 
>>> the forum about what level should be returned depending on which function 
>>> is called first (MPI_T_init_thread or MPI_Init_thread). I don't think it 
>>> was clarified what should be done but since it will be in future errata 
>>> what is in the current implementation should be fine for now.
>>> 
>>> -Nathan
>>> 
>>> On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 12:52:12PM -0600, Nathan Hjelm wrote:
>>>> What: Add initial support for the MPI 3.0 tools interface (MPI_T). Inital 
>>>> support includes full support for the MPI_T_cvar and MPI_T_category 
>>>> interfaces. No pvars are available at this time. Support for pvars will be 
>>>> added at a later time.
>>>> 
>>>> Why: To be MPI 3.0 compliant the MPI_T interface must be implemented. This 
>>>> RFC implements the complete interface.
>>>> 
>>>> When: Monday April 8, 2013. We can make adjustments to the implementation 
>>>> after it is committed to the trunk. The only changes that really need to 
>>>> be reviewed are: ompi/include/mpi.h.in, and structure of the incomming 
>>>> code.
>>>> 
>>>> The changes can be found @ 
>>>> https://github.com/hjelmn/ompi-mca-var/tree/mpit-commit
>>>> 
>>>> Jeff, I added the MPI_T error codes to mpif-values.pl even though they 
>>>> will never be returned by a fortran function. Don't know if that was 
>>>> necessary or not. Please advise.
>>>> 
>>>> Look at:
>>>> https://github.com/hjelmn/ompi-mca-var/commit/689d7d5d95f982794bcba8afb385cdce80bf75e1
>>>> https://github.com/hjelmn/ompi-mca-var/commit/80338e741b1749bb235b9cf45e0db579efe4d61d
>>>> 
>>>> -Nathan
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> devel mailing list
>>>> de...@open-mpi.org
>>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> devel mailing list
>>> de...@open-mpi.org
>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> devel mailing list
>> de...@open-mpi.org
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> de...@open-mpi.org
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel


Reply via email to