Should be. I rebased fro the trunk this morning. Are you sure you cloned the 
mpit-commit branch instead of the old mpit branch? I will remove the old one to 
reduce confusion.

-Nathan

On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 01:05:23PM -0700, Ralph Castain wrote:
> Is this branch up-to-date? I hit this
> 
> checking for pci/pci.h... no
> configure: WARNING: Specified --enable-pci switch, but could not
> configure: WARNING: find appropriate support
> configure: error: Cannot continue
> 
> 
> I assure you I didn't specify that switch - it looks old to me.
> 
> 
> On Apr 5, 2013, at 12:53 PM, Nathan Hjelm <hje...@lanl.gov> wrote:
> 
> > git clone git://github.com/hjelmn/ompi-mca-var.git mpit-commit
> > 
> > -Nathan
> > 
> > On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 12:50:55PM -0700, Ralph Castain wrote:
> >> Nathan - I can't clone this repo - I get an error from git:
> >> 
> >> [rhc@bend001 openmpi]$ git clone  
> >> https://github.com/hjelmn/ompi-mca-var/tree/mpit-commit
> >> Initialized empty Git repository in /home/common/openmpi/mpit-commit/.git/
> >> fatal: https://github.com/hjelmn/ompi-mca-var/tree/mpit-commit/info/refs 
> >> not found: did you run git update-server-info on the server?
> >> 
> >> Can you please let me know how I can get a copy of this code?
> >> 
> >> 
> >> On Apr 5, 2013, at 12:44 PM, Ralph Castain <r...@open-mpi.org> wrote:
> >> 
> >>> Let's bump it to Thurs - I trust what you say, but haven't had a chance 
> >>> to glance at the changes. Likewise, it would be nice to let Jeff return 
> >>> from vacation and look at it too.
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> On Apr 5, 2013, at 12:11 PM, Nathan Hjelm <hje...@lanl.gov> wrote:
> >>> 
> >>>> Yeah, I figured since the changes are self contained (doesn't tough many 
> >>>> outside pieces except info support and mpi.h.in) it would be ok to do a 
> >>>> short timeout. If not I can bump it to Thursday April 11.
> >>>> 
> >>>> -Nathan
> >>>> 
> >>>> On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 12:02:22PM -0700, Ralph Castain wrote:
> >>>>> Ummmm....did you really mean a timeout of Mon?? Could you delay that a 
> >>>>> bit so we can actually have time to look at it?
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> On Apr 5, 2013, at 11:56 AM, Nathan Hjelm <hje...@lanl.gov> wrote:
> >>>>> 
> >>>>>> Also, please look at the thread level support. We had some discussion 
> >>>>>> at the forum about what level should be returned depending on which 
> >>>>>> function is called first (MPI_T_init_thread or MPI_Init_thread). I 
> >>>>>> don't think it was clarified what should be done but since it will be 
> >>>>>> in future errata what is in the current implementation should be fine 
> >>>>>> for now.
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> -Nathan
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 12:52:12PM -0600, Nathan Hjelm wrote:
> >>>>>>> What: Add initial support for the MPI 3.0 tools interface (MPI_T). 
> >>>>>>> Inital support includes full support for the MPI_T_cvar and 
> >>>>>>> MPI_T_category interfaces. No pvars are available at this time. 
> >>>>>>> Support for pvars will be added at a later time.
> >>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>> Why: To be MPI 3.0 compliant the MPI_T interface must be implemented. 
> >>>>>>> This RFC implements the complete interface.
> >>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>> When: Monday April 8, 2013. We can make adjustments to the 
> >>>>>>> implementation after it is committed to the trunk. The only changes 
> >>>>>>> that really need to be reviewed are: ompi/include/mpi.h.in, and 
> >>>>>>> structure of the incomming code.
> >>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>> The changes can be found @ 
> >>>>>>> https://github.com/hjelmn/ompi-mca-var/tree/mpit-commit
> >>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>> Jeff, I added the MPI_T error codes to mpif-values.pl even though 
> >>>>>>> they will never be returned by a fortran function. Don't know if that 
> >>>>>>> was necessary or not. Please advise.
> >>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>> Look at:
> >>>>>>> https://github.com/hjelmn/ompi-mca-var/commit/689d7d5d95f982794bcba8afb385cdce80bf75e1
> >>>>>>> https://github.com/hjelmn/ompi-mca-var/commit/80338e741b1749bb235b9cf45e0db579efe4d61d
> >>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>> -Nathan
> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>> devel mailing list
> >>>>>>> de...@open-mpi.org
> >>>>>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
> >>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>> devel mailing list
> >>>>>> de...@open-mpi.org
> >>>>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> devel mailing list
> >>>>> de...@open-mpi.org
> >>>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> devel mailing list
> >>>> de...@open-mpi.org
> >>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
> >>> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> devel mailing list
> >> de...@open-mpi.org
> >> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
> > _______________________________________________
> > devel mailing list
> > de...@open-mpi.org
> > http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> de...@open-mpi.org
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel

Reply via email to