On Sep 15, 2013, at 12:10 PM, "Barrett, Brian W" <bwba...@sandia.gov> wrote:
> Are the wrapper compilers named shmem<lang>? Given that the OpenSHMEM > specification specifically calls out the name of the wrapper compilers as > osh<lang>, we should probably follow that convention. Yes, they're named shmemcc and shmemfort. So they should be named oshcc and oshfort? I.e., is there a convention for <lang>? -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
