Yes, they should be oshcc, oshCC (there are no C++ bindings, but there is a wrapper compiler), and oshfort, according to the specification.
Brian -- Brian W. Barrett Scalable System Software Group Sandia National Laboratories ________________________________________ From: devel [devel-boun...@open-mpi.org] on behalf of Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) [jsquy...@cisco.com] Sent: Sunday, September 15, 2013 4:13 AM To: Open MPI Developers Subject: Re: [OMPI devel] [EXTERNAL] oshmem implementation still lacking On Sep 15, 2013, at 12:10 PM, "Barrett, Brian W" <bwba...@sandia.gov> wrote: > Are the wrapper compilers named shmem<lang>? Given that the OpenSHMEM > specification specifically calls out the name of the wrapper compilers as > osh<lang>, we should probably follow that convention. Yes, they're named shmemcc and shmemfort. So they should be named oshcc and oshfort? I.e., is there a convention for <lang>? -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/ _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@open-mpi.org http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
