I guess I don't understand your example - shouldn't all the Solaris support be in the lightly tested category? I see only the 32-bit Solaris entry, with everything else still shown in the "full" category
On Oct 6, 2013, at 7:22 PM, "Barrett, Brian W" <bwba...@sandia.gov> wrote: > I agree with the Solaris move. > > Brian > > On 10/4/13 5:08 AM, "Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)" <jsquy...@cisco.com> wrote: > >> This is in the README -- is it still accurate? I'm thinking that all >> Solaris support should move to the "lightly but not fully tested" >> category, for example: >> >> ----- >> - Systems that have been tested are: >> >> - Linux (various flavors/distros), 32 bit, with gcc >> >> - Linux (various flavors/distros), 64 bit (x86), with gcc, Absoft, >> >> Intel, Portland, and Oracle Solaris Studio 12.3 compilers (*) >> >> - OS X (10.5, 10.6, 10.7), 32 and 64 bit (x86_64), with gcc and >> >> Absoft compilers (*) >> >> - Oracle Solaris 10 and 11, 64 bit (SPARC, i386, x86_64), >> >> with Oracle Solaris Studio 12.2 and 12.3 >> >> >> >> (*) Be sure to read the Compiler Notes, below. >> >> >> >> - Other systems have been lightly (but not fully tested): >> >> - Other 64 bit platforms (e.g., Linux on PPC64) >> >> - 32-bit Solaris >> >> ----- >> >> -- >> Jeff Squyres >> jsquy...@cisco.com >> For corporate legal information go to: >> http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> devel mailing list >> de...@open-mpi.org >> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel >> > > > -- > Brian W. Barrett > Scalable System Software Group > Sandia National Laboratories > > > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > de...@open-mpi.org > http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
