On Jan 9, 2014, at 11:00 PM, Paul Hargrove <phhargr...@lbl.gov> wrote:
> The following might be helpful: > > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1653163/difference-between-statvfs-and-statfs-system-calls > > It seems to indicate that even if one does find a statfs() function, there > are multiple os-dependent versions and it should therefore be avoided. Since > statvfs() is defined by POSIX, it should be preferred. Sounds good; I'll do that. > If I am not mistaken, reordering the #if logic in path.c to use *only* > statvfs() when it is available (and *not* trying both as is done now) would > resolve the problems I am seeing with NetBSD and Solaris WITHOUT any need to > change the configure logic. However, if one does want to keep the current > logic (or at least something similar) it looks like configure should not > assume statfs() is available without *also* confirming that "struct statfs" > is available. > > -Paul > > > > > On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 7:18 PM, Paul Hargrove <phhargr...@lbl.gov> wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 7:15 PM, Paul Hargrove <phhargr...@lbl.gov> wrote: > My Solaris-11 build stopped again on the failure to find ibv_open_device(). > I am re-running w/o --enable-openib now. > > It finished while I was typing the previous message. > The Solaris-11 build failed in the same way as Solaris-10. > > -Paul > > -- > Paul H. Hargrove phhargr...@lbl.gov > Future Technologies Group > Computer and Data Sciences Department Tel: +1-510-495-2352 > Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Fax: +1-510-486-6900 > > > > -- > Paul H. Hargrove phhargr...@lbl.gov > Future Technologies Group > Computer and Data Sciences Department Tel: +1-510-495-2352 > Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Fax: +1-510-486-6900 > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > de...@open-mpi.org > http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
