Jeff and I iterated a bit off-list and opal/util/path.c in tonight's trunk
tarball (1.9a1r30255) works for all of my systems.
With the help of Jeff's recently-enhanced test/util/opal_path_nfs.c I was
able to verify that NFS mounts are now correctly identified on the *BSD
systems (and still correct on Linux, Mac OSX, and Solaris).

Marco,
  Can you please verify on Cygwin?

-Paul



On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 6:34 AM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) <jsquy...@cisco.com
> wrote:

> On Jan 10, 2014, at 9:18 AM, "Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)" <jsquy...@cisco.com>
> wrote:
>
> >> It seems to indicate that even if one does find a statfs() function,
> there are multiple os-dependent versions and it should therefore be
> avoided.  Since statvfs() is defined by POSIX, it should be preferred.
> >
> > Sounds good; I'll do that.
>
> Gah.  The situation gets murkier.  I see in OS X Mountain Lion and
> Mavericks man pages for statvfs() where they describe the fields in struct
> statvfs:
>
>            f_fsid     Not meaningful in this implementation.
>
> This is the field I need out of struct statvfs to know what the file
> system magic number is.  Arrgh!
>
> I'll keep looking into what would be a good solution here...
>
> --
> Jeff Squyres
> jsquy...@cisco.com
> For corporate legal information go to:
> http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> de...@open-mpi.org
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>



-- 
Paul H. Hargrove                          phhargr...@lbl.gov
Future Technologies Group
Computer and Data Sciences Department     Tel: +1-510-495-2352
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory     Fax: +1-510-486-6900

Reply via email to