I will prepare a patch that moves the parameter initialization somewhere else
and will not remove it. Do you think the other parts of the patch can be
applied (without sstore_stage_select() removal)?


On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 10:07:36AM -0600, Josh Hursey wrote:
> It should probably be moved to the component initialization of the sstore
> stage component since those parameters are how the user controls where to
> store those files. I think there is an MCA registration function that is
> called after component initialization - that would be the best spot, but I
> do not remember how to set it up at the moment.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 7:25 AM, Adrian Reber <adr...@lisas.de> wrote:
> 
> > I removed a complete function because it was not used:
> >
> > ../../../../../orte/mca/sstore/stage/sstore_stage_component.c: At top
> > level:
> > ../../../../../orte/mca/sstore/stage/sstore_stage_component.c:77:12:
> > warning: 'sstore_stage_select' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
> >  static int sstore_stage_select (void)
> >
> > And grepping through the code it seems the compiler is right.
> >
> > Should we keep the code and maybe just #ifdef it out.
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 07:17:19AM -0600, Josh Hursey wrote:
> > > It looks like you removed a number of sstore stage MCA parameters. Did
> > they
> > > move somewhere else? or do you have a different way to set those
> > parameters?
> > >
> > > Other than that it looks good to me.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 5:29 AM, Adrian Reber <adr...@lisas.de> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I have a simple patch which fixes the remaining compiler warnings when
> > > > running with '--with-ft':
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > https://lisas.de/git/?p=open-mpi.git;a=commitdiff;h=4dee703a0a2e64972b0c35b7693c11a09f1fbe5f
> > > >
> > > > Does anybody see any problems with this patch?
> > > >
> > > >                 Adrian
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > devel mailing list
> > > > de...@open-mpi.org
> > > > http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
> > _______________________________________________
> > devel mailing list
> > de...@open-mpi.org
> > http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel

Reply via email to