Ouch - yes, we definitely should roll it to 4:0:0. I gather the ABI change was required to comply with the spec. I normally would refuse to allow an ABI change during a stable release series, but have given more latitude to OSHMEM due to its relatively new inclusion and the need to get it into compliance.
On Jul 9, 2014, at 1:25 PM, Bert Wesarg <bert.wes...@tu-dresden.de> wrote: > Quoting "Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)" <jsquy...@cisco.com>: >> Here's what I think VERSION should be for 1.8.2: >> >> https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/changeset/32165 >> >> I left comments in the VERSION file as to why I think each version number >> should change. >> >> Can someone please verify that this work is correct? If so, we can remove >> the comments (before the final 1.8.2 release). > >> -liboshmem_so_version=2:0:1 >> +liboshmem_so_version=3:0:2 >> +# lib changed >> +# added interfaces: shmem_int32_finc, shmem_int64_finc, profiling > > I think liboshmem_so_version should get 4:0:0 as the return type of > shmem_finalize changed from int to void. > > Here is the trunk commit: > > https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/changeset/31413 > > And here the CMR commit: > > https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/changeset/31758 > > Regards, > Bert > >> >> -- >> Jeff Squyres > -- > Dipl.-Inf. Bert Wesarg > wiss. Mitarbeiter > > Technische Universität Dresden > Zentrum für Informationsdienste und Hochleistungsrechnen (ZIH) > 01062 Dresden > Tel.: +49 (351) 463-42451 > Fax: +49 (351) 463-37773 > E-Mail: bert.wes...@tu-dresden.de > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > de...@open-mpi.org > Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel > Link to this post: > http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2014/07/15083.php
