confirmed.
Thanks

On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 3:31 PM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) <jsquy...@cisco.com
> wrote:

> Bert: good catch, thanks
>
> Mellanox: can you confirm that this change was required?
>
> Sent from my phone. No type good.
>
> > On Jul 9, 2014, at 4:59 PM, "Ralph Castain" <r...@open-mpi.org> wrote:
> >
> > Ouch - yes, we definitely should roll it to 4:0:0. I gather the ABI
> change was required to comply with the spec. I normally would refuse to
> allow an ABI change during a stable release series, but have given more
> latitude to OSHMEM due to its relatively new inclusion and the need to get
> it into compliance.
> >
> >
> >
> >> On Jul 9, 2014, at 1:25 PM, Bert Wesarg <bert.wes...@tu-dresden.de>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Quoting "Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)" <jsquy...@cisco.com>:
> >>> Here's what I think VERSION should be for 1.8.2:
> >>>
> >>>   https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/changeset/32165
> >>>
> >>> I left comments in the VERSION file as to why I think each version
> number should change.
> >>>
> >>> Can someone please verify that this work is correct?  If so, we can
> remove the comments (before the final 1.8.2 release).
> >>
> >>> -liboshmem_so_version=2:0:1
> >>> +liboshmem_so_version=3:0:2
> >>> +# lib changed
> >>> +# added interfaces: shmem_int32_finc, shmem_int64_finc, profiling
> >>
> >> I think liboshmem_so_version should get 4:0:0 as the return type of
> shmem_finalize changed from int to void.
> >>
> >> Here is the trunk commit:
> >>
> >> https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/changeset/31413
> >>
> >> And here the CMR commit:
> >>
> >> https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/changeset/31758
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Bert
> >>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Jeff Squyres
> >> --
> >> Dipl.-Inf. Bert Wesarg
> >> wiss. Mitarbeiter
> >>
> >> Technische Universität Dresden
> >> Zentrum für Informationsdienste und Hochleistungsrechnen (ZIH)
> >> 01062 Dresden
> >> Tel.: +49 (351) 463-42451
> >> Fax: +49 (351) 463-37773
> >> E-Mail: bert.wes...@tu-dresden.de
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> devel mailing list
> >> de...@open-mpi.org
> >> Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
> >> Link to this post:
> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2014/07/15083.php
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > devel mailing list
> > de...@open-mpi.org
> > Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
> > Link to this post:
> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2014/07/15084.php
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> de...@open-mpi.org
> Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
> Link to this post:
> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2014/07/15093.php
>

Reply via email to