ok, i’ll fix it
> On Jul 6, 2018, at 3:09 PM, Nathan Hjelm via devel <devel@lists.open-mpi.org>
> wrote:
>
> Looks like a bug to me. The second argument should be a value in v3.x.x.
>
> -Nathan
>
>> On Jul 6, 2018, at 4:00 PM, r...@open-mpi.org wrote:
>>
>> I’m seeing this when building the v3.0.x branch:
>>
>> runtime/ompi_mpi_init.c:395:49: warning: passing argument 2 of
>> ‘opal_atomic_cmpset_32’ makes integer from pointer without a cast
>> [-Wint-conversion]
>> if (!opal_atomic_cmpset_32(&ompi_mpi_state, &expected, desired)) {
>> ^
>> In file included from ../opal/include/opal/sys/atomic.h:159:0,
>> from ../opal/threads/thread_usage.h:30,
>> from ../opal/class/opal_object.h:126,
>> from ../opal/class/opal_list.h:73,
>> from runtime/ompi_mpi_init.c:43:
>> ../opal/include/opal/sys/x86_64/atomic.h:85:19: note: expected ‘int32_t {aka
>> int}’ but argument is of type ‘int32_t * {aka int *}’
>> static inline int opal_atomic_cmpset_32( volatile int32_t *addr,
>> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>
>>
>> I have a feeling this isn’t correct - yes?
>> Ralph
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> devel mailing list
>> devel@lists.open-mpi.org
>> https://lists.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.open-mpi.org
> https://lists.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@lists.open-mpi.org
https://lists.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
