Hi Yeoh,
 I am using the same mesh (mesh_id, channel) combination for both interfaces. 
Here is my setup:

Node A [Radio MN2] <-------- Channel 6 ------> [Radio MN2] Node B
Node A [Radio MN1] <-------- Channel 6 ------> [Radio MN1] Node B
Node A [Radio MN1] <-------- Channel 6 ------> [Radio MN2] Node B
Node A [Radio MN2] <-------- Channel 6 ------> [Radio MN1] Node B

Two nodes with two interfaces each, all on the same Mesh_ID and Channel. Then I 
create a bridge on each of the nodes bridging MN2 with MN1. I have STP off. I 
get ping dups. I even tried the case with Node A having just one interface, and 
Node B with two interfaces. Same result.

What do you mean by internal forwarding? Bridging?

-Thanks.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Yeoh Chun-Yeow" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2011 5:49:21 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: Question about joining meshes together

Hi, Bishal 


As long as the mesh id is different, then it should be no problem. Are you 
using the same mesh id for both mesh interfaces in one single node? 


If using the same mesh id in one single node, the mesh path link (iw mesh0 
mpath dump) will have dest addr of our another interface mesh1. But I think 
that internal forwarding is not working yet. 



----->I had done two radio interfaces on a single mesh node (say A), bridge 
them together (802.1d). If I turn off the STP, enable forwarding, and try to 
ping any other mesh node (say B), I used to get ping DUPS. Just FYI. 



Do you mind to share your network setup. I have setup this, even with STP off, 
the ping DUPS is not happened. 


Node A [Radio MN2] <------ Channel 36 -------> [Radio MN2] Node B [Radio MN1] 
<------ Channel 149 --------> [Radio MN1] Node C 


Ping from Node A to Node C is alright with no DUPS. Node B consists of two mesh 
interfaces bridging together using brctl. 


Regards, 
Chun-Yeow 

_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://open80211s.com/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to