Hi Javier and Yeoh, So far the progress I have made in this is that when I do mpath dump with two separate interface I get the same table [same entries]. Now, the IFACE field that already exists (from mpath dump) seems almost useless to me, because it is not the interface that mpath struct stores (mpath->sdata->name).
Therefore, if we do not care what interface the packet arrived on, then we might as well just replace the IFACE printout of mpath dump with the "interface" that will be used to send the data on. What do you think? Instead of having two IFACEs as Javier suggested. BTW Javier, I have tested this out (and HAD tested the two interface scenario before I reported my doubts last time). Its just sometimes, when I am replying emails, I am not anywhere around my lab, and no way to report what I had for results @ "It's just faster to try it rather than to share your doubts with the list, don't you think so?" -- I agree :). Thanks, _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://open80211s.com/mailman/listinfo/devel
