On Sun, 2012-06-10 at 00:11 +0800, Yeoh Chun-Yeow wrote: > > so, humm, there's still the same constant here. > > > > and here. > > > > Possible to stick to the number, because in the standard it define > (0) no root > (2) proactive PREQ no PREP > (3) proactive RPEQ with PREP > (4) RANN > > Not so sure what's the proper naming for this constant.
You could make up a name, or use >= 2 instead of > 1 ? johannes _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.open80211s.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
