Alberto,

We have positive experience with those with tiny dongles
with Ralink RT2870 and RT3070. They should be 150 and 300
mbps N capable, but are single band.
However, I haven't elaborated these features, so I don't
know if you can drive 11s with these caps. Also, I haven't
tried other chips, so the "positive" is subjective.
I would not expect something equal to boxed APs with
large antennas, because these dongles protrude less than
1/4 inch out of usb connectors.

--- shinoda

On 2012/10/17, at 18:26, Alberto Jimenez Pacheco wrote:

> Help, anyone?
> Any recommendations for USB wifi cards with good support for 802.11s?
> 
> Thanks a lot.
> Alberto.
> 
> 
> On 25 September 2012 11:34, Alberto Jimenez Pacheco <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> (Better with a subject)
> 
> Hello,
> 
> We are quite new to 802.11s. Can anyone recommend at small form factor USB 
> WiFi card (dongle) to work with 802.11s? 
> With good driver support and that has been intensively tested, showing 
> reliable performance under Linux in mesh mode. 
> (As a bonus, if it is dual-band, 2.4 and 5 GHz, and can be configured with 
> 802.11n, then even better)
> Thanks.
> 
> We have gone through the list at http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Drivers 
> and based on that we are currently using one model from Fritz! (WLAN USB 
> Stick N, with Atheros chipset and driver carl9170) ... but we are not getting 
> very reliable performance with 802.11s. 
> 
> In the past we have done extensive testing with this card in ad-hoc mode, and 
> it was offering quite good performance and reliability. 
> However, when used in mesh mode with 802.11s, it performs rather poorly: 
> we build a mesh with three laptops in close proximity in the same room, so 
> all routes are one-hop, everything fine; 
> but if we force a two-hop route between two of the nodes using the third as 
> relay with 
> iw dev <devname> mpath set <destination MAC address> next_hop <next hop MAC 
> address>,
> then ping shows a lot of packets lost in a more or less random behaviour. 
> Good performance comes back as soon we re-establish the previous one-hop 
> route with a similar command.
> 
> We do not know whether it is a hardware problem and a different card would 
> solve it, or if maybe we are missing something in the configuration.
> Anyone else suffering this problem?
> 
> Thanks for your help.
> Alberto.
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.open80211s.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel

_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.open80211s.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to