Rod, > Could we have official confirmation or denial of this rumour please, > and > an accompanying timeframe?
projects.openmoko.org will continue to be run by Openmoko, without an end date. We did decide, however, that we cannot invest major engineering resources into fixing and improving GForge. If someone wants to do this they are very welcome to help us, get in touch with roh and Gismo who keep our GForge server running. They probably have a long list of things they would like to see improved in GForge. Now comes the tricky part: 1) We are operating out own GForge server. 2) We know it is technically behind. 3) We know not much activity out there is going on to change this. 4) We looked at our business model and realized we rather focus our engineering resources on what we believe we can be really good at, mobile devices, not Internet services. 5) We know there are technically better code hosting services on the Internet, for example launchpad.net or code.google.com. Should we continue to point people to our GForge server, without saying anything about alternatives? Should we point to alternatives that are technically better but emotionally or philosophically disliked? Bottom line - we realized the world is not black and white. Nobody is waiting for Openmoko to unify the whole world of Free Software. People will put their source codes in many different places anyway. We will continue to operate our own GForge server. We openly say that we cannot afford to put serious (i.e. full-time) engineering resources into improving GForge. We call for help, if anyone can improve GForge please do so. But also we acknowledge there are (technically) better alternatives out there, like code.google.com. Does this make sense? Best Regards, Wolfgang On Aug 22, 2008, at 9:39 AM, Rod Whitby wrote: > Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) rumoured: >> as such - projects.om.org is desired to go as its gforge base is a >> bit >> abandoned, and the solutions bandied about have been "use google >> code or >> sourceforge etc."... so as the solution is to use someone elses >> infra. i know >> i'll use my own :) > > Looks like it's time to move MokoMakefile back to svn.nslu2- > linux.org ... > > Could we have official confirmation or denial of this rumour please, > and > an accompanying timeframe? > > -- Rod > > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/devel _______________________________________________ devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
