Werner,
Werner Almesberger wrote:
> Philip Rhoades wrote:
>> Still using:
>>
>> wlan-trial-20090206.jffs2
>
> If you could give your regular rootfs a try with my kernel, that
> would be great. What I'm interested in now is to confirm if the
> communication breakdown is caused by the assertion.
To summarise:
Using:
wlan-trial-20090206.uImage
openmoko-fso-image-glibc-ipk--20090202-om-gta02.rootfs.jffs2
Booted using:
u-boot USB console
setenv bootcmd setenv bootargs \${bootargs_base} \${mtdparts}\; nand
read.e 0x32000000 kernel 0x300000\; bootm 0x32000000
saveenv
boot
I then setup wireless networking and run my script for testing LAN
connection - it has now been running for nearly 26 hours! (and is still
going) - about 10 hours longer than the previous record!
The question is was this just a lucky test or is there a significant
difference between kernels:
wlan-trial-20090206.uImage
and FSO M5:
uImage-2.6.28-oe1+gitr34240a1c06ae36180dee695aa25bbae869b2aa26-r3-om-gta02.bin
that is allowing the much improved uptime?
Regards,
Phil.
--
Philip Rhoades
GPO Box 3411
Sydney NSW 2001
Australia
E-mail: p...@pricom.com.au
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@lists.openmoko.org
https://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
