On Wednesday 25 June 2008, Ovidiu Sas wrote: > As much as I hate to jump into heated discussions, I want to see > OpenSER moving forward toward the 1.4 release. > It seems that the main issue here is the new 'local_route' feature. > Some of us are against keeping it as is for the next release and some > others would really like to have it in the next release. > Obviously, there's no solution that will satisfy 100% both parties. > > Here's a proposed scenario to move forward on this issue: > - we need to open a bug for each item that is broken in the current > implementation of local_route; > - the community must decide what needs to be really fixed for the > upcoming 1.4 release. > > Once we have the MUST fix list, we will focus on fixing them and > validating the upcoming release. > The things that are not working (not in the MUST fix list) needs to be > documented into the release notes. This will set the right > expectations for the end user. > > I hope that this is a good compromise for everyone and I'm looking > forward for opinions. > Let's focus on this thread on how to get out of this awkward situation > and move forward.
Hello Ovidiu, thank you for the mail. Unfortunally i don't think that its that easy to fix, as we're in some sort of dead-lock situation here. I don't see any will to come to an compromise from the major players involved. Just to stop further rumors, i want to inform you that Daniel started a vote on the board on this issue. The majority of the board is for enclosing this feature in #ifdefs. I still wait for an statement from Bogdan in this issue. Cheers, Henning _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.openser.org http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
