Hello Henning, Thank you for keeping us posted.
Regards, Ovidiu Sas On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 10:56 AM, Henning Westerholt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wednesday 25 June 2008, Ovidiu Sas wrote: >> As much as I hate to jump into heated discussions, I want to see >> OpenSER moving forward toward the 1.4 release. >> It seems that the main issue here is the new 'local_route' feature. >> Some of us are against keeping it as is for the next release and some >> others would really like to have it in the next release. >> Obviously, there's no solution that will satisfy 100% both parties. >> >> Here's a proposed scenario to move forward on this issue: >> - we need to open a bug for each item that is broken in the current >> implementation of local_route; >> - the community must decide what needs to be really fixed for the >> upcoming 1.4 release. >> >> Once we have the MUST fix list, we will focus on fixing them and >> validating the upcoming release. >> The things that are not working (not in the MUST fix list) needs to be >> documented into the release notes. This will set the right >> expectations for the end user. >> >> I hope that this is a good compromise for everyone and I'm looking >> forward for opinions. >> Let's focus on this thread on how to get out of this awkward situation >> and move forward. > > Hello Ovidiu, > > thank you for the mail. Unfortunally i don't think that its that easy to fix, > as we're in some sort of dead-lock situation here. I don't see any will to > come to an compromise from the major players involved. > > Just to stop further rumors, i want to inform you that Daniel started a vote > on the board on this issue. The majority of the board is for enclosing this > feature in #ifdefs. I still wait for an statement from Bogdan in this issue. > > Cheers, > > Henning > _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.openser.org http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel