El Friday 27 June 2008 09:21:13 Daniel-Constantin Mierla escribió: > On 06/26/08 16:44, Klaus Darilion wrote: > > Is it useful to have an AoR without username? > > I don't need it personally. It is why I asked.
It's completely valid in RFC 3261, but probably 100% useless in real life. > > Maybe AoRs without > > username should be rejected always. > > I would prefer the same as well. Has anyone ever seen a REGISTER with no username in the AoR ? I just can't imagine the purpose of it. IMHO rejecting those exotic registrations is the best option. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.openser.org http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
