On 06/27/08 12:41, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote: > El Friday 27 June 2008 09:21:13 Daniel-Constantin Mierla escribió: > >> On 06/26/08 16:44, Klaus Darilion wrote: >> >>> Is it useful to have an AoR without username? >>> >> I don't need it personally. It is why I asked. >> > > It's completely valid in RFC 3261, but probably 100% useless in real life. > Having an AoR with just domain or having location records for domain only?
Do you have direct references? Thanks, Daniel > > >>> Maybe AoRs without >>> username should be rejected always. >>> >> I would prefer the same as well. >> > > Has anyone ever seen a REGISTER with no username in the AoR ? > I just can't imagine the purpose of it. > IMHO rejecting those exotic registrations is the best option. > > > > -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://www.asipto.com _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.openser.org http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
