Hi, On Mar 30, 2012, at 4:22 PM, Nick Altmann wrote:
> I'm not agree with you, because I use m4 now. > > Such functionality was really useful together with include functionality. > For example, when I have errors with m4 it's hard to understand in > what line these errors occurred. > > m4 is not always convenient, > I should compile my configuration every time, but I don't need all > power of m4, I need only substitutions. > m4 is not a panacea for all occasions. > I agree with Vlad here. I maintain a huge configuration file consisting of several m4 files and never felt the need to stretch the configuration file syntax. Regards, -- Saúl Ibarra Corretgé AG Projects _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
