Hi Nick, On Apr 2, 2012, at 10:11 AM, Nick Altmann wrote:
> Some things, such defines and substitutions, would be comfortable > inside opensips. > Why don't you use m4 inside C code, but use defines? Don't it stretch C > sources? > Well, a quick wikipedia search sows that C predates m4. > And another question. Why includes support was applied to opensips? It > also can be done by m4. Sure, if you ask me, I also don't like it. > It's useful to have a few ways to do something, convenient to each > opensips user. > If m4 is better for you, it doesn't mean that it's better for me. > Sure, there is no on-fits-all solution, I just expressed my own opinion and support for the decision taken by the core team not to include the suggested patch. Regards, -- Saúl Ibarra Corretgé AG Projects _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
