As long as people don't leave the bug untouched for 6 months, it won't be considered abandoned. So this will enforce better bug wrangling.
On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 12:33 PM Sławomir Nizio <[email protected]> wrote: > > I agree with this, how long do we think is 'fair' before resolving a bug > > due to abandonment? 6months? > > There are 409 bugs open. > > 73 have been changed within the last 6 months, > 36 within the previous 6 months (that is, starting from July 4th, 2016), > 31 since 2016-01-09, > 44 since 2015-07-01, > 36 since 2015-01-08, > 34 since 2014-07-11, > 59 since 2014-01-12, > 57 since 2013-07-07, > 37 since 2013-01-20, > 2 since 2012-07-07. > > (I verified the sum with awk. :P) > > The are no older bugs because they were once closed. > > These figures alone don't form an answer but at least we could see what > number of bugs would be affected. > > I think that 6 months would work just to have a smallish number of bugs > to focus on, but then some would be reopened, and who knows, maybe the > final number would be doubled meaning there would be 146 bugs to work on. > >
