How much risk is there in allowing updated packages now, if we know we're going to spend more time polishing? That could help mitigate the deluge of updates if it's a large concern.
On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 3:46 AM Geaaru <gea...@sabayonlinux.org> wrote: > On site official release from latest news is 16.11 (a very old release). > > From my side I think that could be correct choice 2. > > My cent > > On Mon, 2018-04-02 at 23:48 +0000, Jerrod Frost wrote: > > I'm looking for a discussion on how we feel about releasing. A few options > have been presented. We can: > > 1. Delay Release, make a few package bumps, and polish release with a Goal > of 18.05 (mostly remaining frozen) > 2. Clean up and Release ASAP with 18.04 (Unfreeze and allow updates to > flow) > > I'm curious what the rest of the team thinks? > I like the idea of Delaying release to polish up. We can switch to Uniform > Icons across all spins, switch LightDM's Greeter to Slick-greeter, etc. We > could take the chance to wow the users. The downside is we'd hit users with > a wave of updates right after fresh install due to long freeze. We'd also > be delaying the release so some sort of update to our users of our current > status would also be needed in our blog/news section. > > So are we looking more to the deadline of 18.04 or are we looking to the > image of polished environment for users? > > Thanks, > Darksurf > >
