Hi, Stipe, > yep, that was the intention... but it still in a more "weaker" scope, since > the > NEWPIN actually does "only" check if the user is not "accidently" accepting > some > send OTAs. It still does not specify a mechanism to pre-define the default > profile, right?
I guess this is right, since NETWIN only avoids for the user entering some random PIN and since there is nothing about how to make the settings as primary in the OTA OMA specs. > > I'm curious to know what solutions to assure that most of the users > > are able to send and receive MM are employed elsewhere, at least in > > Germany or some other countries. > > didn't get the point in this paragraph? Well, I was expecting an answer kind of "we are having Vodafone here which sells customized, but well known brands phones where settings are burned into phones with no possibility to change or modify them" or something like that :) Anyway, the problem we're discussing seems to have more general affect, for example, mostly, users also have to receive settings for their phone's media player to watch some video stream, but they still have to mark them as active. I was actually started to think about some reversed solution, where the address (in most cases this is URL) would define (in GGSN or somewhere else) how to reach that address. This is in fact not possible for sending MMS, since some "home url" must be defined in the phone itself. I'm also thinking why guys from standards organizations like ETSI didn't define some EF in SIM for MMS settings. IMHO this kind of solution would have worked perfectly as it works for SMS parameters defined in EF_SMSP under DF_TELECOM. -- Dziugas _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@mbuni.org http://mbuni.org/mailman/listinfo/devel_mbuni.org
