Yo Hal! On Wed, 05 Oct 2016 11:55:36 -0700 Hal Murray <[email protected]> wrote:
> [email protected] said: > >> I'd vote for getting rid of KERNEL_PLL. > > Me too, but the alternative has to not suck. The last test remove > > was a terrible failure. > > What "test remove" was that? Eric added --disable-kernel-pll last week. commit c6b45a2d332ab98f278691fbb462e6b65a528649 Author: Eric S. Raymond <[email protected]> Date: Wed Sep 28 14:20:51 2016 -0400 Implement --disable-kernel-pll configuration option. I posted the results to this email list. I have attached one of the graphs from that thread that shows the bad results. The option was applied at 28-18:45. After that time the time offset and jitter got way worse. The time to recover from LF changes also got much worse. Check out the list archives for the entire discussion. RGDS GARY --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703 [email protected] Tel:+1 541 382 8588
pgp5eXweX7EVc.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
