Hal Murray <[email protected]>:
>
> [email protected] said:
> >> I'd vote for getting rid of KERNEL_PLL.
> > Me too, but the alternative has to not suck. The last test remove was a
> > terrible failure.
>
> What "test remove" was that?
I implemented a --disable-kernel-pll option so Gary could test with
KERNEL_PLL and without on otherwise identical platforms. He reported
the results on IRC. They were pretty horrible. Already-bad convergence
times went up by orders of magnitude.
--
<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond</a>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
