Mike Christie wrote: > Dev, Vasu wrote: >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Mike Christie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 12:52 PM >>> >>> Or if fc_exch_mgr_reset ran between the time fc_seq_lookup_recip drops >>> the ref from the fc_exch_find and when fc_exch_recv_req runs, can >>> fc_exch_mgr_reset free the ep we are trying to access before the added >>> holds in your patch? >> Yes this is another issue, this can occur just after call to >> lp>tt.exch_get(lp, fp) in fc_exch_resp() or fc_exch_seq_send()(this is >> not an issue due to upper layer locks as we discussed before). > > I was not asking about this path though. I was trying to figure out how > the exch_done call does the last release. See my other mail. But yeah I > agree if the refcounts are right in fc_seq_lookup_recip usage then it > should not happen above and it is another issue. >
Ignore this. I see what you are talking about now. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list [email protected] http://www.open-fcoe.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
